首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk-based security-constrained optimal power flow: Mathematical fundamentals, computational strategies, validation, and use within electricity markets
【2h】

Risk-based security-constrained optimal power flow: Mathematical fundamentals, computational strategies, validation, and use within electricity markets

机译:基于风险的受安全约束的最佳潮流:数学基础,计算策略,验证和在电力市场中的使用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This dissertation contributes to develop the mathematical fundamentals and computational strategies of risk-based security-constrained optimal power flow (RB-SCOPF) and validate its application in electricity markets. The RB-SCOPF enforces three types of flow-related constraints: normal state deterministic flow limits, contingency state deterministic flow limits (the \u22N-1\u22 criteria), and contingency state system risk, which depends only on contingency states but not the normal state. Each constraint group is scaled by a single parameter setting allowing tradeoffs between deterministic constraints and system risk. Relative to the security-constrained optimal power flow (SCOPF) used in industry today, the RB-SCOPF finds operating conditions that are more secure and more economic. It does this by obtaining solutions that achieve better balance between post-contingency flows on individual circuits and overall system risk. The method exploits the fact that, in a SCOPF solution, some post-contingency circuit flows which exceed their limits impose little risk while other post-contingency circuit flows which are within their limits impose significant risk. The RB-SCOPF softens constraints for the former and hardens constraints for the latter, thus achieving simultaneous improvement in both security and economy. Although the RB-SCOPF is more time-intensive to solve than SCOPF, we have developed efficient algorithms that allow RB-SCOPF to solve in sufficient time for use in real-time electricity markets. In contrast to SCOPF, which motivates market behavior to offload circuit flows exceeding rated flows, the use of RB-SCOPF provides price signals that motivate market behavior to offload circuit flows and to enhance system-wide security levels. Voltage stability testing has demonstrated that the dispatch result based on RB-SCOPF has higher reactive margins at normal state and after a contingency happens, thus has better static voltage stability performance.
机译:本文为发展基于风险的安全约束最优潮流(RB-SCOPF)的数学基础和计算策略做出了贡献,并验证了其在电力市场中的应用。 RB-SCOPF强制执行三种与流量相关的约束:正常状态确定性流量限制,应急状态确定性流量限制(\ u22N-1 \ u22标准)和应急状态系统风险,该风险仅取决于应急状态,而不取决于应急状态。正常状态。每个约束组由单个参数设置缩放,从而可以在确定性约束和系统风险之间进行权衡。相对于当今工业中受安全约束的最佳潮流(SCOPF),RB-SCOPF可以找到更安全,更经济的运行条件。它通过获得在单个电路上的事后流与整体系统风险之间实现更好的平衡的解决方案来做到这一点。该方法利用了以下事实:在SCOPF解决方案中,某些超出其限制的应急后电路流带来的风险很小,而其他处于其极限内的应急后电路流则带来了很大的风险。 RB-SCOPF减轻了对前者的约束,并加强了对后者的约束,从而在安全性和经济性方面实现了同时的改善。尽管RB-SCOPF的解决时间比SCOPF更为耗时,但我们已经开发出了有效的算法,可以使RB-SCOPF在足够的时间内解决问题,以用于实时电力市场。与SCOPF激励市场行为以使电路流量卸载超过额定流量相比,RB-SCOPF的使用提供了价格信号,以激励市场行为以使电路流量卸载并增强系统范围的安全级别。电压稳定性测试表明,基于RB-SCOPF的调度结果在正常状态下和偶发事件发生后具有较高的无功裕度,因此具有较好的静态电压稳定性能。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, Qin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号